Re: [RFC][PATCH] new modversions implementation

From: David Woodhouse (dwmw2@infradead.org)
Date: Sun Feb 02 2003 - 03:51:17 EST

Next message: Gregoire Favre: "2.5.59 and aic7xxx fails at every second boot..."
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: [PCMCIA] [IDE] [2.5.59-mm7] Badness in kobject_register call trace"
In reply to: Paul Marinceu: "Re: [RFC][PATCH] new modversions implementation"
Next in thread: Rusty Russell: "Re: [RFC][PATCH] new modversions implementation"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sun, 2003-02-02 at 08:37, Paul Marinceu wrote:
> Also, whatever happened to modversions.h? A module I have refuses to
> compile without it. I'm not yet such a good hacker to figure out how your
> new modversions implementation works 8)

Then that module was _always_ broken. The kernel build system always
included modversions.h for you iff you needed it.

-- dwmw2

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Gregoire Favre: "2.5.59 and aic7xxx fails at every second boot..."
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: [PCMCIA] [IDE] [2.5.59-mm7] Badness in kobject_register call trace"
In reply to: Paul Marinceu: "Re: [RFC][PATCH] new modversions implementation"
Next in thread: Rusty Russell: "Re: [RFC][PATCH] new modversions implementation"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 07 2003 - 22:00:08 EST