Re: [PATCH 2.5.59] cpufreq: support for "target frequency governors"

From: Dave Jones (davej@suse.de)
Date: Tue Feb 04 2003 - 07:13:48 EST

Next message: Adrian Bunk: "Re: gcc 2.95 vs 3.21 performance"
Previous message: Dave Jones: "Re: [Lse-tech] gcc 2.95 vs 3.21 performance"
In reply to: Dominik Brodowski: "[PATCH 2.5.59] cpufreq: support for "target frequency governors""
Next in thread: Dominik Brodowski: "Re: [PATCH 2.5.59] cpufreq: support for "target frequency governors""
Reply: Dominik Brodowski: "Re: [PATCH 2.5.59] cpufreq: support for "target frequency governors""
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 11:14:43PM +0100, Dominik Brodowski wrote:
> This patch adds support for "cpufreq governors".
> <snip excellent description of governors>

Could you add your descriptions to Documentation/cpufreq/ too?
The cpufreq interface has come quite a way since the original version
and is getting quite complex. Keeping documentation around for it
can only be a good thing, and as you've already written it.. 8-)

Dave

-- 
| Dave Jones.        http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
| SuSE Labs
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Adrian Bunk: "Re: gcc 2.95 vs 3.21 performance"
Previous message: Dave Jones: "Re: [Lse-tech] gcc 2.95 vs 3.21 performance"
In reply to: Dominik Brodowski: "[PATCH 2.5.59] cpufreq: support for "target frequency governors""
Next in thread: Dominik Brodowski: "Re: [PATCH 2.5.59] cpufreq: support for "target frequency governors""
Reply: Dominik Brodowski: "Re: [PATCH 2.5.59] cpufreq: support for "target frequency governors""
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 07 2003 - 22:00:14 EST