On Wednesday 05 February 2003 11:40, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> I'd appreciate if you could check why bitkeeper thinks such function
> is nobh_truncate_page and not block_truncate_page as my GPL software
> pretends while it checkouts all the changesets from the bitkeeper
> servers.
Andrea,
The change from block_truncate_page to nobh_truncate_page was done in
Changeset 1.879.43.1. This was created on January 9th, but not merged
into Linus' tree until Monday, so it is not in 2.5.59. I think the
date of the changeset preceding 2.5.59 is causing the confusion.
Thanks,
Shaggy
-- David Kleikamp IBM Linux Technology Center- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 07 2003 - 22:00:18 EST