Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de> wrote:
>
> it might be simply an error in the tarball, maybe Linus's tree isn't in
> full sync with bk head. But something definitely is corrupt between
> tarball and bk.
Well, the 2.5.59 BK tree shows that function using block_truncate_page() as
well.
The question is why did the Jan 9 changeset in the 2.5.55 timeframe not
appear in the tree until post-2.5.59. Maybe on Jan 9 Linus only part-merged
it by some means (making the web interface claim it is there), and this week
completed the merge and updated the checkin comment?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 07 2003 - 22:00:18 EST