Re: [BENCHMARK] 2.5.60 with contest

From: Jens Axboe (axboe@suse.de)
Date: Tue Feb 11 2003 - 04:47:11 EST

Next message: Geoffrey Lee: "[PATCH] add missing include for cpqfcTSinit.c"
Previous message: Andreas Schwab: "Re: Is -fno-strict-aliasing still needed?"
In reply to: Con Kolivas: "[BENCHMARK] 2.5.60 with contest"
Next in thread: Andrew Morton: "Re: [BENCHMARK] 2.5.60 with contest"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tue, Feb 11 2003, Con Kolivas wrote:
> Might give the cfq scheduler a go

That would be cool. I'm not expecting really good results, it's untuned
and all that. But would be interesting to see preliminary results, none
the less.

-- Jens Axboe

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Geoffrey Lee: "[PATCH] add missing include for cpqfcTSinit.c"
Previous message: Andreas Schwab: "Re: Is -fno-strict-aliasing still needed?"
In reply to: Con Kolivas: "[BENCHMARK] 2.5.60 with contest"
Next in thread: Andrew Morton: "Re: [BENCHMARK] 2.5.60 with contest"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Feb 15 2003 - 22:00:32 EST