Re: 2.5.60 cheerleading...

From: Dave Jones (davej@codemonkey.org.uk)
Date: Wed Feb 12 2003 - 13:55:39 EST

Next message: Grover, Andrew: "RE: was Re: [2.4.20][2.5.60] /proc/interrupts - Now: ACPI moving of IRQs"
Previous message: Richard B. Johnson: "Re: Panic `cat /proc/ioports`"
In reply to: Scott Robert Ladd: "RE: 2.5.60 cheerleading..."
Next in thread: Paul Larson: "Re: 2.5.60 cheerleading..."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 01:17:27PM -0500, Scott Robert Ladd wrote:

> I wonder if testers should post configs that worked, so developers can
> compare against configs that failed?

Please don't. .configs tend to be huge, and a flood of
'me too' type posts will increase size of linux-kernel
dramatically.

Dave

-- 
| Dave Jones.        http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
| SuSE Labs
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Grover, Andrew: "RE: was Re: [2.4.20][2.5.60] /proc/interrupts - Now: ACPI moving of IRQs"
Previous message: Richard B. Johnson: "Re: Panic `cat /proc/ioports`"
In reply to: Scott Robert Ladd: "RE: 2.5.60 cheerleading..."
Next in thread: Paul Larson: "Re: 2.5.60 cheerleading..."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Feb 15 2003 - 22:00:43 EST