RE: Question about 48 bit IDE on 2.4.18 kernel

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Thu Feb 13 2003 - 20:59:16 EST

Next message: Martin J. Bligh: "Re: Strange TCP with 2.5.60"
Previous message: Core: "[PATCH] Ingo's E6 vs 2.5.60-mm1"
In reply to: Larry Hileman: "RE: Question about 48 bit IDE on 2.4.18 kernel"
Next in thread: Andre Hedrick: "RE: Question about 48 bit IDE on 2.4.18 kernel"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Thu, 2003-02-13 at 23:51, Larry Hileman wrote:
> Do the 2.4.20/21 predrivers work on a 2.4.18 kernel?
> Or have they been back ported?

No and no. The newer IDE code has dependancies on the block layer
improvements.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Martin J. Bligh: "Re: Strange TCP with 2.5.60"
Previous message: Core: "[PATCH] Ingo's E6 vs 2.5.60-mm1"
In reply to: Larry Hileman: "RE: Question about 48 bit IDE on 2.4.18 kernel"
Next in thread: Andre Hedrick: "RE: Question about 48 bit IDE on 2.4.18 kernel"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Feb 15 2003 - 22:00:50 EST