Here are contest (http://contest.kolivas.org) benchmarks with the osdl
hardware (http://www.osdl.org) for 2.5.61
no_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.59 3 79 93.7 0.0 0.0 1.00
2.5.60 2 79 94.9 0.0 0.0 1.00
2.5.61 1 79 94.9 0.0 0.0 1.00
cacherun:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.59 3 76 97.4 0.0 0.0 0.96
2.5.60 2 75 98.7 0.0 0.0 0.95
2.5.61 1 76 97.4 0.0 0.0 0.96
process_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.59 3 92 81.5 29.7 17.4 1.16
2.5.60 2 93 80.6 30.5 17.2 1.18
2.5.61 1 93 80.6 29.0 16.1 1.18
ctar_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.59 3 98 80.6 2.0 5.1 1.24
2.5.60 2 99 78.8 1.0 4.0 1.25
2.5.61 2 100 79.0 1.0 4.0 1.27
xtar_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.59 3 102 74.5 1.0 3.9 1.29
2.5.60 2 101 76.2 1.0 5.0 1.28
2.5.61 2 102 75.5 1.0 4.9 1.29
io_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.59 3 152 50.0 34.1 13.1 1.92
2.5.60 2 139 54.7 29.0 12.1 1.76
2.5.61 2 143 52.4 32.9 13.3 1.81
io_other:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.59 3 89 84.3 11.2 5.6 1.13
2.5.60 2 90 83.3 10.8 5.5 1.14
2.5.61 2 91 82.4 11.1 5.5 1.15
read_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.59 3 101 77.2 6.5 5.0 1.28
2.5.60 2 103 74.8 6.2 6.8 1.30
2.5.61 2 102 77.5 6.3 4.9 1.29
list_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.59 3 95 80.0 0.0 6.3 1.20
2.5.60 2 95 80.0 0.0 6.3 1.20
2.5.61 2 95 81.1 0.0 6.3 1.20
mem_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.59 3 95 82.1 52.7 2.1 1.20
2.5.60 2 98 79.6 53.0 2.0 1.24
2.5.61 1 96 81.2 54.0 2.1 1.22
dbench_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.59 3 214 36.4 2.3 40.7 2.71
2.5.61 2 237 32.5 3.0 47.3 3.00
Dbench signalling is working it seems now
I see no significant difference b/w .60 and .61
Con
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Feb 15 2003 - 22:01:00 EST