Re: [PATCH] CFQ scheduler, #2

From: Rik van Riel (riel@conectiva.com.br)
Date: Sat Feb 15 2003 - 06:22:00 EST

Next message: Con Kolivas: "Re: 2.5.61-mm1"
Previous message: Roger Luethi: "[4/4][via-rhine][PATCH] Reset function rewrite"
In reply to: Mike Galbraith: "Re: [PATCH] CFQ scheduler, #2"
Next in thread: Jens Axboe: "Re: [PATCH] CFQ scheduler, #2"
Reply: Jens Axboe: "Re: [PATCH] CFQ scheduler, #2"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sat, 15 Feb 2003, Mike Galbraith wrote:

> I gave this a burn, and under hefty load it seems to provide a bit of
> anti-thrash benefit.

Judging from your log, it ends up stalling kswapd and
dramatically increases the number of times that normal
processes need to go into the pageout code.

If this provides an anti-thrashing benefit, something's
wrong with the VM in 2.5 ;)

Rik

-- 
Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH".
http://www.surriel.com/		http://guru.conectiva.com/
Current spamtrap:  <a href=mailto:"october@surriel.com">october@surriel.com</a>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Con Kolivas: "Re: 2.5.61-mm1"
Previous message: Roger Luethi: "[4/4][via-rhine][PATCH] Reset function rewrite"
In reply to: Mike Galbraith: "Re: [PATCH] CFQ scheduler, #2"
Next in thread: Jens Axboe: "Re: [PATCH] CFQ scheduler, #2"
Reply: Jens Axboe: "Re: [PATCH] CFQ scheduler, #2"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Feb 15 2003 - 22:01:01 EST