Re: [PATCH] BUG() call in vmalloc.c causes segmentation fault.

• Next message: Linus Torvalds: "Re: more signal locking bugs?"
• Previous message: $B5HF#1QL@(: "Re: [PATCHSET] PC-9800 subarch. support for 2.5.61 (16/26) NIC"
• Maybe in reply to: Robert Williamson: "[PATCH] BUG() call in vmalloc.c causes segmentation fault."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

I forgot to mention that this patch was against 2.4.21-pre4.

- Robbie

Robert V. Williamson <robbiew@us.ibm.com>
Linux Test Project
IBM Linux Technology Center
Phone: (512) 838-9295 T/L: 678-9295
Fax: (512) 838-4603
Web: http://ltp.sourceforge.net
IRC: #ltp on freenode.irc.net
====================
"Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm
not sure about the former." -Albert Einstein

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Linus Torvalds: "Re: more signal locking bugs?"
• Previous message: $B5HF#1QL@(: "Re: [PATCHSET] PC-9800 subarch. support for 2.5.61 (16/26) NIC"
• Maybe in reply to: Robert Williamson: "[PATCH] BUG() call in vmalloc.c causes segmentation fault."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Feb 23 2003 - 22:00:19 EST