Re: PATCH: make the sl82c105 work again

From: Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk)
Date: Tue Feb 18 2003 - 13:53:09 EST

Next message: Max Krasnyansky: "Re: [PATCH/RFC] New module refcounting for net_proto_family"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "PATCH: ide-dma, fix bogus inc of waiting_for_dma"
In reply to: Alan Cox: "PATCH: make the sl82c105 work again"
Next in thread: Benjamin Herrenschmidt: "Re: PATCH: make the sl82c105 work again"
Reply: Benjamin Herrenschmidt: "Re: PATCH: make the sl82c105 work again"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 06:34:29PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
> + hwif->drives[0].pio_speed = XFER_PIO_0;
> + hwif->drives[0].autotune = 1;
> + hwif->drives[1].pio_speed = XFER_PIO_1;
> + hwif->drives[1].autotune = 1;

Is there some reason why drive 1 is PIO 1 and drive 0 is PIO 0 ?

-- Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk) The developer of ARM Linux http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Max Krasnyansky: "Re: [PATCH/RFC] New module refcounting for net_proto_family"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "PATCH: ide-dma, fix bogus inc of waiting_for_dma"
In reply to: Alan Cox: "PATCH: make the sl82c105 work again"
Next in thread: Benjamin Herrenschmidt: "Re: PATCH: make the sl82c105 work again"
Reply: Benjamin Herrenschmidt: "Re: PATCH: make the sl82c105 work again"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Feb 23 2003 - 22:00:23 EST