Re: PATCH: clean up the IDE iops, add ones for a dead iface

From: Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk)
Date: Tue Feb 18 2003 - 18:09:10 EST

Next message: Beat Bolli: "Re: kbuild: error with parallel make and modules"
Previous message: Benjamin Herrenschmidt: "Re: [ACPI] Re: Fixes to suspend-to-RAM"
In reply to: Alan Cox: "PATCH: clean up the IDE iops, add ones for a dead iface"
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: PATCH: clean up the IDE iops, add ones for a dead iface"
Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: PATCH: clean up the IDE iops, add ones for a dead iface"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 06:03:21PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
> +static u8 ide_unplugged_inb (unsigned long port)
> +{
> + return 0xFF;
> +}

Shouldn't this return 0x7f, ie bit 7 clear, as if we have an interface
without drive attached?

-- Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk) The developer of ARM Linux http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Beat Bolli: "Re: kbuild: error with parallel make and modules"
Previous message: Benjamin Herrenschmidt: "Re: [ACPI] Re: Fixes to suspend-to-RAM"
In reply to: Alan Cox: "PATCH: clean up the IDE iops, add ones for a dead iface"
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: PATCH: clean up the IDE iops, add ones for a dead iface"
Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: PATCH: clean up the IDE iops, add ones for a dead iface"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Feb 23 2003 - 22:00:23 EST