On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 04:47:15PM +0000, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
> In article <Pine.LNX.4.44.0302201656030.30000-100000@localhost.localdomain>,
> Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
> >the fix for this is two-fold. First, it must be possible for procps to
> >separate 'threads' from 'processes' without having to go into 16 thousand
> >directories. I solved this by prefixing 'threads' (ie. non-group-leader
> >threads) with a dot ('.') character in the /proc listing:
>
> Why not put threads belonging to a thread group into /proc/17072/threads ?
I'm also inclined to think this is a good idea. We could even choose
to use /proc/17072/lwp, to match Solaris, but it's probably not worth
it since the semantics are different.
-- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Feb 23 2003 - 22:00:29 EST