Re: [ACPI] Re: mem= option for broken bioses

From: Pavel Machek (pavel@suse.cz)
Date: Thu Feb 27 2003 - 11:16:17 EST

Next message: Horst von Brand: "Re: [PATCH 7/8] dm: __LOW macro fix no. 2"
Previous message: Pavel Machek: "Re: [ACPI] Re: mem= option for broken bioses"
In reply to: Robert Woerle Paceblade/Support: "Re: [ACPI] Re: mem= option for broken bioses"
Next in thread: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: mem= option for broken bioses"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi!

> >Well, similar method to how you use mem=123@456 parameters. You just
> >guess them. [Given kernel messages, it is actually quite easy.]
> >
> >
> >
> well .. wow ... what a accurate solution `????
> ...
> ..
> .
> well cant you tell me more ?

Well, you know where acpi tables start from dmesg. You can only guess
how long tables are, through.
Pavel

-- 
Horseback riding is like software...
...vgf orggre jura vgf serr.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Horst von Brand: "Re: [PATCH 7/8] dm: __LOW macro fix no. 2"
Previous message: Pavel Machek: "Re: [ACPI] Re: mem= option for broken bioses"
In reply to: Robert Woerle Paceblade/Support: "Re: [ACPI] Re: mem= option for broken bioses"
Next in thread: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: mem= option for broken bioses"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 28 2003 - 22:00:44 EST