Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org> wrote:
>
> Mem_load result of AS being slower was just plain weird with the result rising
> from 100 to 150 during testing.
>
Maybe we should just swap computers or something?
Finished compiling kernel: elapsed: 145 user: 180 system: 18
Finished mem_load: elapsed: 146 user: 0 system: 2 loads: 5000
Finished compiling kernel: elapsed: 135 user: 181 system: 17
Finished mem_load: elapsed: 136 user: 0 system: 2 loads: 4800
Finished compiling kernel: elapsed: 129 user: 181 system: 17
Finished mem_load: elapsed: 130 user: 0 system: 2 loads: 4800
256MB, dual CPU, ext3/IDE.
Whereas 2.5.63+bk gives:
Finished compiling kernel: elapsed: 131 user: 182 system: 17
Finished mem_load: elapsed: 131 user: 0 system: 1 loads: 4900
Finished compiling kernel: elapsed: 135 user: 182 system: 17
Finished mem_load: elapsed: 135 user: 0 system: 1 loads: 4800
Finished compiling kernel: elapsed: 129 user: 182 system: 17
Finished mem_load: elapsed: 129 user: 0 system: 1 loads: 4600
Conceivably swap fragmentation, but unlikely. Is it still doing a swapoff
between runs?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Mar 07 2003 - 22:00:24 EST