On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 01:06:37AM +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
> > Only the bits that did the module locking crap, which
> > is unnecessary afaics. If you look at the files touched,
> > there's still nowayout used in the other functions.
>
> You need to lock the module in memory in the nowayout case
> Otherwise the module can be unloaded (which is ok), and then
> reloaded (which is not).
>
> So yes, you broke NOWAYOUT. Its a bit subtle and under
> documented I admit.
Bugger. Ok, I'll add that to the TODO.
Dave
-- | Dave Jones. http://www.codemonkey.org.uk | SuSE Labs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Mar 07 2003 - 22:00:30 EST