Re: WimMark I for 2.5.64-mm1

From: Joel Becker (Joel.Becker@oracle.com)
Date: Fri Mar 07 2003 - 14:19:19 EST

Next message: Ivan Kokshaysky: "[fixed] Re: PCI init issues"
Previous message: Joel Becker: "Re: WimMark I for 2.5.64-mm1"
In reply to: Andrew Morton: "Re: WimMark I for 2.5.64-mm1"
Next in thread: Randy.Dunlap: "Re: WimMark I for 2.5.64-mm1"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 10:43:33AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Is the difference between 2.5.64 and 2.5.64-mm1 statistically significant?
> (It should be - the readahead changes).

Yes, it is. The average is noticeably different, and the high
number for 2.5.64 isn't much higher than the low number for 2.5.64-mm1.

Joel

Life's Little Instruction Book #157

"Take time to smell the roses."

Joel Becker Senior Member of Technical Staff Oracle Corporation E-mail: joel.becker@oracle.com Phone: (650) 506-8127 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Ivan Kokshaysky: "[fixed] Re: PCI init issues"
Previous message: Joel Becker: "Re: WimMark I for 2.5.64-mm1"
In reply to: Andrew Morton: "Re: WimMark I for 2.5.64-mm1"
Next in thread: Randy.Dunlap: "Re: WimMark I for 2.5.64-mm1"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Mar 07 2003 - 22:00:38 EST