Re: Oops: 2.5.64 check_obj_poison for 'size-64'

From: Zwane Mwaikambo (zwane@linuxpower.ca)
Date: Fri Mar 07 2003 - 21:42:30 EST

Next message: Joel Becker: "Re: [PATCH] register_blkdev"
Previous message: Roman Zippel: "Re: [BK PATCH] klibc for 2.5.64 - try 2"
In reply to: Andrew Morton: "Re: Oops: 2.5.64 check_obj_poison for 'size-64'"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, Andrew Morton wrote:

> Looks to me like you overran the page for seq_printf, which then returned -1
> which then triggered what appears to be some utterly bogus code in
> show_interrupts():
>
> for (j = 0; j < NR_CPUS; j++)
> if (cpu_online(j))
> p += seq_printf(p, "%10u ", irq_stat[j].apic_timer_irqs);
>
> Why is it modifying `p' there? That's the pointer to the seq_file which
> we're using.

Probably leftovers from the previous interface.

> Kill. Two instances.

Ok i'm just testing the seq_file buffer increase.

Thanks,
Zwane

-- 
function.linuxpower.ca
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Joel Becker: "Re: [PATCH] register_blkdev"
Previous message: Roman Zippel: "Re: [BK PATCH] klibc for 2.5.64 - try 2"
In reply to: Andrew Morton: "Re: Oops: 2.5.64 check_obj_poison for 'size-64'"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Mar 07 2003 - 22:00:40 EST