Followup to: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0303120714030.13807-100000@home.transmeta.com>
By author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
>
> On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Dave Jones wrote:
> >
> > > +#define cpu_has_xstore boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_XSTORE)
> >
> > Do we want to do this check only on VIA CPUs I wonder.
> > As a vendor specific extension, I'd be inclined to do that.
>
> No, the whole point of all the crud in arch/i386/kernel/cpu is to make
> those tests _once_ at bootup, and then the internal kernel "extended CPU
> feature set" has a unique feature-set that is independent of manufacturers
> and totally disjunct, so that we never need to care about manufacturers
> ever again.
>
Right. I have also pointed out to Jeff already that the test is done
wrong... it's pretty clear from the code that VIA has set up a feature
flag space of their own like Intel, AMD and Transmeta already have
(which is a good thing), so we should add that as an additional word
in the feature test vector instead of special-casing such a bit.
In fact, we need to add two words since Intel ran out of theirs and
started using additional flags in %ecx just recently.
-hpa
-- <hpa@transmeta.com> at work, <hpa@zytor.com> in private! "Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot." Architectures needed: ia64 m68k mips64 ppc ppc64 s390 s390x sh v850 x86-64 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Mar 15 2003 - 22:00:31 EST