Hi,
I've been benchmarking file copy operations between 2.5.65-mm1
and 2.4.20-2.51 since I have noticed that transferring files from my
2.4.20 machine to 2.5.65-mm1 gives an steady 10MBps throughput
but doing the opposite (from 2.5.65-mm1 to 2.4.20) gives me a
mere 3MBps throughput.
After transferring a 256MB file using NFS and SCP, I have noticed
several "eth0: Transmit error, Tx status register 90.". I have attached
dmesg output, ioports, iomem, lsmod and lspci.
Any ideas on what's happing here? Why network transfers do
complete in less time when sending data from 2.40.20 to
2.5.65-mm1 kernel, but take more than twice when doing the
opposite?
Thanks!
Felipe
-- ______________________________________________ http://www.linuxmail.org/ Now with e-mail forwarding for only US$5.95/yrPowered by Outblaze
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Mar 23 2003 - 22:00:25 EST