current->fs->root vs. current->fs->altroot

From: Torsten Foertsch (torsten.foertsch@gmx.net)
Date: Fri Mar 21 2003 - 05:16:41 EST

Next message: Pavel Machek: "Re: share COMPATIBLE_IOCTL()s across architectures"
Previous message: Pavel Machek: "Kill COMPATIBLE_IOCTL() code duplication"
Next in thread: Andries Brouwer: "Re: current->fs->root vs. current->fs->altroot"
Reply: Andries Brouwer: "Re: current->fs->root vs. current->fs->altroot"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

can someone please explain the difference between a task's root and altroot.

Thanks,
Torsten
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+euaMwicyCTir8T4RAjaeAJ43cQV+a0RGLXZXQ70W2F7nzPomCACgozD0
+fsb6V7+DFxmTTox2Wxqqus=
=4nR8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Pavel Machek: "Re: share COMPATIBLE_IOCTL()s across architectures"
Previous message: Pavel Machek: "Kill COMPATIBLE_IOCTL() code duplication"
Next in thread: Andries Brouwer: "Re: current->fs->root vs. current->fs->altroot"
Reply: Andries Brouwer: "Re: current->fs->root vs. current->fs->altroot"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Mar 23 2003 - 22:00:35 EST