Re: lmbench results for 2.4 and 2.5

• Next message: Ronald Bultje: "request_module status"
• Previous message: Russell King: "Re: 2.4+ptrace exploit fix breaks root's ability to strace"
• Maybe in reply to: Chris Friesen: "lmbench results for 2.4 and 2.5"
• Next in thread: Linus Torvalds: "Re: lmbench results for 2.4 and 2.5"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

If someone wants to go through individual lmbench metrics
and find regression points, I have some data that I believe
is mostly very good.

There is lmbench info for a lot of 2.4 and 2.5 kernels in
these pages:
http://home.earthlink.net/~rwhron/kernel/k6-2-475.html
http://home.earthlink.net/~rwhron/kernel/old-k6-2-475.html

They are from 2 different Linux OS's, but the same piece
of hardware. It would be best not to combine them because
of the OS differences.

If anyone feels like grabbing any of the data in my web
pages and graphing it, feel free to do so.

If you have any specific questions or want even more
data/background let me know. I'd love for the data
to be more useful.

There is another page with a slew of quad xeon benchmarks.
http://home.earthlink.net/~rwhron/kernel/bigbox.html

-- 
Randy Hron
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Ronald Bultje: "request_module status"
• Previous message: Russell King: "Re: 2.4+ptrace exploit fix breaks root's ability to strace"
• Maybe in reply to: Chris Friesen: "lmbench results for 2.4 and 2.5"
• Next in thread: Linus Torvalds: "Re: lmbench results for 2.4 and 2.5"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Mar 23 2003 - 22:00:42 EST