* Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk) wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-03-21 at 22:15, Chris Wright wrote:
> > on first pass of the cmd. However, this is inconsistent with the rest
> > of the file, so here is a patch to use kcmd.resbuf. I also added a NULL
> > check, as done in similar funcitons in this file. Alan, this look ok?
>
> Looks slightly wrong to me
>
> #1 ->resbuf = NULL is a completely acceptable if odd user choice. If invalid
> its covered
OK, I wasn't sure if it was valid. I noticed the other routines in that
file making similar checks.
> #2 - We copy to the users nominated cmd->resbuf. You are correct there,
> that we should be using the kernel side copy. Fixed in my tree.
Great, thanks.
-chris
-- Linux Security Modules http://lsm.immunix.org http://lsm.bkbits.net - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Mar 23 2003 - 22:00:42 EST