Re: [PATCH] alternative dev patch

From: Roman Zippel (zippel@linux-m68k.org)
Date: Sun Mar 23 2003 - 10:11:16 EST


Hi,

On Sun, 23 Mar 2003, Christoph Hellwig wrote:

> That;s not exactly true. A tradition major device is nothing but a
> region with a fixed size, and we need to get rid of this major/minor
> thinking. Converting a dev_t to struct char_device * / struct block_device *
> early is the way we wan't to go for that. It helped the block layer
> a lot..

I basically agree, I only want to note that the block layer only has to
deal with disks, where we have different types of character devices. So
having one major per serial/tape/tty/... devices might not be necessary,
but it could makes things bit easier. In any case the actual drivers
should not see any of this.

bye, Roman

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Mar 23 2003 - 22:00:44 EST