>> akpm has suggested something like this in the past. I respectfully
>> disagree.
>
> I also disagree. Although it would be nice, it's not practical. What
> people want is strictly fixes and security related patches, and that
> is ALL I propose to want to include. Perhaps if the vendors
> want a "common vendor" patch they could maintain it? ;)
I still think the common vendor kernel is valuable, but different ;-)
A straight fixes tree is valuable too ... thanks.
M.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Mar 23 2003 - 22:00:46 EST