Re: Negative dynamic priorities in 2.5.6[4-6]?

From: Jon Burgess (Jon_Burgess@eur.3com.com)
Date: Tue Mar 25 2003 - 13:52:37 EST

Next message: Tolentino, Matthew E: "RE: unsupported bridge with intel E7205 chipset"
Previous message: Raja R Harinath: "Re: [CHECKER] potential dereference of user pointer errors"
Maybe in reply to: Erik Hensema: "Negative dynamic priorities in 2.5.6[4-6]?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> top from procps-2.0.11 treats PRI as an unsigned long long

Known problem with top, for fix see
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85423

Jon

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Tolentino, Matthew E: "RE: unsupported bridge with intel E7205 chipset"
Previous message: Raja R Harinath: "Re: [CHECKER] potential dereference of user pointer errors"
Maybe in reply to: Erik Hensema: "Negative dynamic priorities in 2.5.6[4-6]?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Mar 31 2003 - 22:00:21 EST