"Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@mindspring.com> wrote:
>
> > The only change which comes to mind is the below one. Could you do a
> > patch -R of this and retest?
>
> ... patch deleted ...
>
> that fixed it, but i only this second noticed the "-R" for reversing
> the patch. i applied it normally against my 2.5.66-bk12 tree, and
> it apparently applied cleanly.
>
> wouldn't that suggest that that patch wasn't in my tree in the first
> place? i'm sure i'm up to bk12 at this point.
>
I am now very confused.
That patch _is_ in 2.5.66-bk12. If a `patch -R' of that patch made bk12 work
correctly then the patch was the source of the changed behaviour.
Please start again ;)
Test 2.5.66, then 2.5.66-bk12, then 2.5.66-bk12 with a `patch -R' of
the patch which I sent in the earlier email.
Thanks again.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Apr 07 2003 - 22:00:29 EST