On Sun, 20 Apr 2003 12:51:54 +0200, Helge Hafting said:
> > These don't address the problem - if the drive won't go "ready" because
> > of a blown server platter, your data won't get overwritten but it's still
> > readable (a number of companies make good money at this).
> >
> I see. Your data is so special that you expect people to pay for
> reconstruction hoping to find something that pays for all
> that trouble and more.
No, I don't consider my data that special - I just say "screw it" and
go looking for the backups. However, my point is that it's not THAT
hard to salvage data off drives - it's easy enough that companies are
making a living doing it.
The question is regarding sites that are paranoid about shipping out
their data when such recovery is possible.
> Why would it be hard to reach the inner surfaces - the disks
> are not superconducting so the outer ones do not shield the
> inner ones from a strong magnetic field. You should be fine
> as long as the field extend far enough to get the entire
> drive. A high-frequency device might have trouble,
> but you don't need that - even a static field will do.
I didn't say it was impossible - I said you had to use a degausser that
was up to the task. A degausser that is rated to bulk-erase tape media
is probably *NOT* sufficiently strong to do a multi-platter disk. Most
tapes need 350 Oe or so to bulk, while disks are in the 1500 Oe range.
And you need a really big-ass magnet to make a 1500 Oe field big enough to
cover an entire disk (especially if it's an older disk of the 5.25 or
even larger variety - older IBM mainframe disks were up to 14" platters).
The Canadian government seems to agree - they recommend either getting the
degaussing wand between the platters (page 10) or using a cavity degausser
(page 12). Note that they do *not* certify cavity degaussers for disk drives
over 3 1/2" with a coercivity over 1100Oe.
http://collection.nlc-bnc.ca/100/200/301/ cse-cst/cse_app-ef/itspl-02.pdf
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Apr 23 2003 - 22:00:27 EST