Re: Are linux-fs's drive-fault-tolerant by concept?

From: Stephan von Krawczynski (skraw@ithnet.com)
Date: Mon Apr 21 2003 - 06:24:09 EST

Next message: Andrew Morton: "updates for the new IRQ API"
Previous message: Denis Vlasenko: "Re: Are linux-fs's drive-fault-tolerant by concept?"
In reply to: John Bradford: "Re: Are linux-fs's drive-fault-tolerant by concept?"
Next in thread: John Bradford: "Re: Are linux-fs's drive-fault-tolerant by concept?"
Reply: John Bradford: "Re: Are linux-fs's drive-fault-tolerant by concept?"
Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: Are linux-fs's drive-fault-tolerant by concept?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, 21 Apr 2003 10:55:12 +0100 (BST)
John Bradford <john@grabjohn.com> wrote:

> > And again, how do you think this should work out on your _root_
> > partition? (see below)
>
> 1. Hot plug a new disk

On Linux IDE ??

Are you sure?

Regards,
Stephan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Andrew Morton: "updates for the new IRQ API"
Previous message: Denis Vlasenko: "Re: Are linux-fs's drive-fault-tolerant by concept?"
In reply to: John Bradford: "Re: Are linux-fs's drive-fault-tolerant by concept?"
Next in thread: John Bradford: "Re: Are linux-fs's drive-fault-tolerant by concept?"
Reply: John Bradford: "Re: Are linux-fs's drive-fault-tolerant by concept?"
Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: Are linux-fs's drive-fault-tolerant by concept?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Apr 23 2003 - 22:00:28 EST