On Wed, Apr 23, 2003 at 01:11:46AM +0200, Felipe Alfaro Solana wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-04-22 at 23:00, Richard B. Johnson wrote:
> > First, I don't understand how as you say, "suggestions are
> > desperately needed" on a developmental kernel. These things are
> > not known to work on all configurations and some information like
> > "It gives me hex codes..." is worthless. Please write down
> > these "hex-codes" and, after booting a version the works, run them
> > through ksymoops. If you don't know what that is:
>
> ksymoops? I thought 2.5 kernels didn't need ksymoops anymore and that
> function names were automatically "guessed" in call stack traces.
>
IFF you use "include symbols" when building you shouldn't need ksymoops.
IMO, if you're using 2.5.x you really should include the symbols - chances
are you'll need em.
-- Murray J. Root- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Apr 23 2003 - 22:00:35 EST