Salut,
On Fri, Apr 25, 2003 at 11:51:19PM -0700, Randy.Dunlap wrote:
> What's the preferred thing to do here? I would like to see explicit
> #includes when symbols are used. Is that what others expect also?
It's perlable. I might do this if you want.
> However, it makes for quite a large list of missing includes.
I suppose this is because it's implicitly included via some other
include file. You will need to descend through
#include <blah>
in order to do the right checks.
Thunder
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Apr 30 2003 - 22:00:24 EST