Re: [RFD] Combined fork-exec syscall.

• Next message: Davide Libenzi: "Re: [RFD] Combined fork-exec syscall."
• Previous message: Rafael Costa dos Santos: "Re: [RFD] Combined fork-exec syscall."
• In reply to: Larry McVoy: "Re: [RFD] Combined fork-exec syscall."
• Next in thread: Måns Rullgård: "Re: [RFD] Combined fork-exec syscall."
• Reply: Måns Rullgård: "Re: [RFD] Combined fork-exec syscall."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sun, 27 Apr 2003, Larry McVoy wrote:

> If you do this, _please_ make it compat with NT.

Actually, I thought about this. My first thought is this could benefit
WINE running on Linux. Then (not like I'm a Wine expert by any means) I
figured it might be an issue as far as having to do some preliminary
wineserver setup work (if anybody on this list knows better than me, speak
up!)

But yeah, basically, something similar to NT's CreateProcess(). For the
cases where the one-step process creation is sufficient.

L8r,
Mark G.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Davide Libenzi: "Re: [RFD] Combined fork-exec syscall."
• Previous message: Rafael Costa dos Santos: "Re: [RFD] Combined fork-exec syscall."
• In reply to: Larry McVoy: "Re: [RFD] Combined fork-exec syscall."
• Next in thread: Måns Rullgård: "Re: [RFD] Combined fork-exec syscall."
• Reply: Måns Rullgård: "Re: [RFD] Combined fork-exec syscall."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Apr 30 2003 - 22:00:28 EST