Re: [RFD] Combined fork-exec syscall.

• Next message: Mark Grosberg: "Re: [RFD] Combined fork-exec syscall."
• Previous message: Måns Rullgård: "Re: [RFD] Combined fork-exec syscall."
• In reply to: Davide Libenzi: "Re: [RFD] Combined fork-exec syscall."
• Next in thread: Mark Grosberg: "Re: [RFD] Combined fork-exec syscall."
• Reply: Mark Grosberg: "Re: [RFD] Combined fork-exec syscall."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Davide Libenzi wrote:

> This is very much library stuff. I don't think that saving a couple of
> system calls will give you an edge, expecially when we're talking of
> spawning another process. Even if the process itself does nothing but
> return. Ulrich might be eventually interested ...

POSIX has a spawn interface, see <spawn.h> on modern systems. A syscall
should be compatible with this interface.

- --
- --------------. ,-. 444 Castro Street
Ulrich Drepper \ ,-----------------' \ Mountain View, CA 94041 USA
Red Hat `--' drepper at redhat.com `---------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+rIbE2ijCOnn/RHQRAstmAKClxTVl6JUUsKycwat1o3UGqPF64wCgsH5j
imxS5VWcVU0li0nNK2Aa99o=
=Z49l
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Mark Grosberg: "Re: [RFD] Combined fork-exec syscall."
• Previous message: Måns Rullgård: "Re: [RFD] Combined fork-exec syscall."
• In reply to: Davide Libenzi: "Re: [RFD] Combined fork-exec syscall."
• Next in thread: Mark Grosberg: "Re: [RFD] Combined fork-exec syscall."
• Reply: Mark Grosberg: "Re: [RFD] Combined fork-exec syscall."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Apr 30 2003 - 22:00:28 EST