Re: [RFD] Combined fork-exec syscall.

• Next message: Osamu Tomita: "Re: [PATCH] 2.5.67-ac2 fix new PIO handlers"
• Previous message: Mark Grosberg: "Re: [RFD] Combined fork-exec syscall."
• In reply to: Måns Rullgård: "Re: [RFD] Combined fork-exec syscall."
• Next in thread: dean gaudet: "Re: [RFD] Combined fork-exec syscall."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 28 Apr 2003, [iso-8859-1] Måns Rullgård wrote:

> > But yeah, basically, something similar to NT's CreateProcess(). For the
> > cases where the one-step process creation is sufficient.
>
> Is that the call that takes dozens of parameters? Copying :-) that
> is, IMHO, straight against the UNIX philosophy.

Well, it does take quite a few parameters. I wasn't thinking that it be
nearly that messy. See my first message for my original proposal.

L8r,
Mark G.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Osamu Tomita: "Re: [PATCH] 2.5.67-ac2 fix new PIO handlers"
• Previous message: Mark Grosberg: "Re: [RFD] Combined fork-exec syscall."
• In reply to: Måns Rullgård: "Re: [RFD] Combined fork-exec syscall."
• Next in thread: dean gaudet: "Re: [RFD] Combined fork-exec syscall."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Apr 30 2003 - 22:00:28 EST