Re: [benchmarks] various filesystems on 2.5.68

From: Hans Reiser (reiser@namesys.com)
Date: Mon Apr 28 2003 - 07:53:59 EST

Next message: Art Haas: "[PATCH] C99 initializers for drivers/media"
Previous message: Art Haas: "[PATCH] C99 initializers for sound/"
In reply to: rwhron@earthlink.net: "[benchmarks] various filesystems on 2.5.68"
Next in thread: rwhron@earthlink.net: "Re: [benchmarks] various filesystems on 2.5.68"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

>mount -t reiserfs -o defaults,noatime /dev/sdc1 /fs1
>
You should benchmark us with notail option if you want it to be fair
compared to less space conserving filesystems. This has a substantial
performance impact, and since you don't measure space usage in these
benchmarks....

> ---------------- Sequential ----------
> ----- Create ----- ---- Delete ----
> files /sec %CPU Eff /sec %CPU Eff
>2.5.68-ext3 65536 10828 70.3 15395 21160 98.0 2159
>2.5.68-reiserfs 131072 2935 37.3 7861 1787 25.7 6963
>
What is the meaning of the files parameter, and why is our number
different from the other filesystems?

-- Hans

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Art Haas: "[PATCH] C99 initializers for drivers/media"
Previous message: Art Haas: "[PATCH] C99 initializers for sound/"
In reply to: rwhron@earthlink.net: "[benchmarks] various filesystems on 2.5.68"
Next in thread: rwhron@earthlink.net: "Re: [benchmarks] various filesystems on 2.5.68"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Apr 30 2003 - 22:00:29 EST