Re: [RFC][PATCH] Faster generic_fls

From: Falk Hueffner (falk.hueffner@student.uni-tuebingen.de)
Date: Thu May 01 2003 - 09:14:17 EST

Next message: David S. Miller: "Re: Remains of seq_file conversion for DECnet, plus fixes"
Previous message: Martin J. Bligh: "Re: Kernel source tree splitting"
In reply to: Willy TARREAU: "Re: [RFC][PATCH] Faster generic_fls"
Next in thread: Willy TARREAU: "Re: [RFC][PATCH] Faster generic_fls"
Reply: Willy TARREAU: "Re: [RFC][PATCH] Faster generic_fls"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Willy TARREAU <willy@w.ods.org> writes:

> On Thu, May 01, 2003 at 03:05:57PM +0800, hugang wrote:
> Ok, I recoded the tree myself with if/else, and it's now faster than
> all others, whatever the compiler.

Have you tried with not simply increasing, but random numbers? I guess
this could make quite a difference here because of branch prediction.

-- 
	Falk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: David S. Miller: "Re: Remains of seq_file conversion for DECnet, plus fixes"
Previous message: Martin J. Bligh: "Re: Kernel source tree splitting"
In reply to: Willy TARREAU: "Re: [RFC][PATCH] Faster generic_fls"
Next in thread: Willy TARREAU: "Re: [RFC][PATCH] Faster generic_fls"
Reply: Willy TARREAU: "Re: [RFC][PATCH] Faster generic_fls"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 07 2003 - 22:00:13 EST