On Fri, 2003-04-18 at 04:22, Arcady Stepanov wrote:
> The patch is trivial:
This patch is wrong.
> /* IP route accounting ptr for this logical cpu number. */
> -#define IP_RT_ACCT_CPU(i) (ip_rt_acct + cpu_logical_map(i) * 256)
> +#define IP_RT_ACCT_CPU(i) ((u8*)ip_rt_acct + cpu_logical_map(i) * 256)
There is no way this can be correct. Look at the formula used
by ip_input.c, which is:
struct ip_rt_acct *st = ip_rt_acct + 256*smp_processor_id();
So there is only two possibilities, either your patch is wrong
or this code in ip_input.c is wrong.
You probably want to keep IP_RT_ACCT_CPU() how it is, cast _THAT_
to "u8 *" then add in the offset.
Also, you'd get a response more quickly if you had sent this to
the networking development lists (linux-net and netdev@oss.sgi.com)
CC:'ing the networking maintainers (myself and Alexey Kuznetsov).
I came across this posting by pure luck.
linux-kernel is effectively /dev/null for some of us on many days.
Just like ipv4 and ipv6, linux kernel is an unreliable transport.
-- David S. Miller <davem@redhat.com> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 07 2003 - 22:00:18 EST