Followup to: <20030504222227.GB6808@twiddle.net>
By author: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
> On Sun, May 04, 2003 at 10:25:26AM -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> > asmlinkage int sys_iopl(unsigned long unused)
> > {
> > struct pt_regs * regs = (struct pt_regs *) &unused; <== yuck!
> [...]
> > Shouldnt it be like this?
> >
> > asmlinkage int sys_iopl (struct pt_regs regs)
>
> No, it should be like
>
> int sys_iopl (struct pt_regs *regs)
>
> and assembly language should push the proper address.
>
> The struct-as-argument form allows the compiler to
> smash the entire structure as it sees fit.
>
Hardly - it has to correspond to the ABI for the platform."
Presumably that's where the "asmlinkage" piece comes in.
-hpa
-- <hpa@transmeta.com> at work, <hpa@zytor.com> in private! "Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot." Architectures needed: ia64 m68k mips64 ppc ppc64 s390 s390x sh v850 x86-64 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 07 2003 - 22:00:20 EST