Re: The disappearing sys_call_table export.

• Next message: Mike Waychison: "Re: processes stuck in D state"
• Previous message: Maciej Soltysiak: "C99 initialisers in 2.4?"
• In reply to: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: The disappearing sys_call_table export."
• Next in thread: Eric W. Biederman: "Re: The disappearing sys_call_table export."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, May 05, 2003 at 04:28:08PM +0200, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
>
>>LSM?
>
> LSM is explicitly not syscall hooks. And educated readers of lkml should

Yes, sorry, I mixed that up with an old Usenix paper.

> know my opinion on LSM...

Um yeah.
/me puts on asbestos suit
I remember your patch to remove the nested syscall (sys_security) for
LSM quite well.

Carl-Daniel

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Mike Waychison: "Re: processes stuck in D state"
• Previous message: Maciej Soltysiak: "C99 initialisers in 2.4?"
• In reply to: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: The disappearing sys_call_table export."
• Next in thread: Eric W. Biederman: "Re: The disappearing sys_call_table export."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 07 2003 - 22:00:22 EST