Re: The 2.6 kernel, expected to be released by late next month

From: Colin Paul Adams (colin@colina.demon.co.uk)
Date: Tue May 06 2003 - 08:16:33 EST

Next message: Brett: "Re: 2.5.69 just doesn't boot (neither does anything > .67)"
Previous message: David van Hoose: "[2.5.69] Fails on "Uncompressing Kernel" (detailed)"
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: The 2.6 kernel, expected to be released by late next month"
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: The 2.6 kernel, expected to be released by late next month"
Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: The 2.6 kernel, expected to be released by late next month"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

>>>>> "Alan" == Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> writes:

Alan> Wildly improbable. 2.6-test maybe, but there are way too
Alan> many bugs left including data corruption.

What sort of data corruption?

I've just ordered a dual Xeon machine, so I was planning to run 2.5.x
on it, to maximize throughput, but this sounds worrying. perhaps I'd
better stick to 2.4.n?

-- 
Colin Paul Adams
Preston Lancashire
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Brett: "Re: 2.5.69 just doesn't boot (neither does anything > .67)"
Previous message: David van Hoose: "[2.5.69] Fails on "Uncompressing Kernel" (detailed)"
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: The 2.6 kernel, expected to be released by late next month"
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: The 2.6 kernel, expected to be released by late next month"
Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: The 2.6 kernel, expected to be released by late next month"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 07 2003 - 22:00:26 EST