On Tue, 2003-05-06 at 02:49, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > In any case, if the __STRICT_ANSI__ conditional is there in types.h, it
> > should be there in byteorder.h as well.
>
> I don't agree with you in principle, but as this is 2.4 it's probably
> better to just add it. Would you mind sending Marcelo a patch?
What if one of these "used from userland anyways" headers needs
the 64-bit swabs?
This is why I'm so against this patch.
-- David S. Miller <davem@redhat.com> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 07 2003 - 22:00:26 EST