Re: X unlock bug revisited

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Tue May 06 2003 - 10:18:06 EST

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: Binary firmware in the kernel - licensing issues."
Previous message: Stephen Smalley: "[PATCH] Process Attribute API for Security Modules 2.5.69"
In reply to: Bill Davidsen: "X unlock bug revisited"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Maw, 2003-05-06 at 16:50, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> Some months ago I noted that a new kernel introduced a failure to be able
> to unlock X after locking. Still there in 2.5.69 for RH 7.2, 7.3, and 8.0.

Its a pam bug triggered by the subtle scheduling timing changes and
fixed in Red Hat 9

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: Binary firmware in the kernel - licensing issues."
Previous message: Stephen Smalley: "[PATCH] Process Attribute API for Security Modules 2.5.69"
In reply to: Bill Davidsen: "X unlock bug revisited"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 07 2003 - 22:00:27 EST