>> Does 2.5 use a separate interrupt stack? (Excuse my ignorance; I
>> haven't been paying attention.) Total stack-page usage in the 2.4
>> model, at any rate, is the sum of the task struct, the usage of any
>> task-level thread (system calls, pretty much), any softirq (including
>> the network protocol & routing handlers, and any netfilter modules),
>> and some number of possibly-nested hard interrupts.
>
> Depends on the architecture. s390 does, ppc didn't as of 2.4.2, the
> rest I'm not sure about. But this is another requirement for stack
> reduction to 4k for most platforms, if not all.
There are patches to make i386 do this (and use 4K stacks as a config option)
from Dave Hansen and Ben LaHaise in 2.5-mjb tree.
>> One thing that would help (aside from separate interrupt stacks)
>> would be a guard page below the stack. That wouldn't require any
>> physical memory to be reserved, and would provide positive indication
>> of stack overflow without significant runtime overhead.
>
> Yes, that should work. It needs some additional code in the page fault
> handler to detect this case, but that shouldn't slow the system down
> too much.
There's stack overflow detection in there as well.
M.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 07 2003 - 22:00:32 EST