Re: OSDL DBT-2 AS vs. Deadline 2.5.68-mm2

From: Zwane Mwaikambo (zwane@linuxpower.ca)
Date: Wed May 07 2003 - 17:41:13 EST

Next message: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: [PATCH] 2.5 ide 48-bit usage"
Previous message: Andrew Morton: "Re: WimMark I report for 2.5.69"
In reply to: Mark Haverkamp: "Re: OSDL DBT-2 AS vs. Deadline 2.5.68-mm2"
Next in thread: Martin Josefsson: "Re: OSDL DBT-2 AS vs. Deadline 2.5.68-mm2"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, 7 May 2003, Mark Haverkamp wrote:

> That is what I thought, but I wanted to get a machine with lots of
> memory to try it out on.

if(aac->pae_support)
pci_set_dma_mask(dev, 0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFUL);

This probably wants 0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFULL and checking pci_set_dma_mask()
return value.

-- 
function.linuxpower.ca
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: [PATCH] 2.5 ide 48-bit usage"
Previous message: Andrew Morton: "Re: WimMark I report for 2.5.69"
In reply to: Mark Haverkamp: "Re: OSDL DBT-2 AS vs. Deadline 2.5.68-mm2"
Next in thread: Martin Josefsson: "Re: OSDL DBT-2 AS vs. Deadline 2.5.68-mm2"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 07 2003 - 22:00:33 EST