On Thu, May 08, 2003 at 02:59:11AM -0700, Bill Huey wrote:
> On Thu, May 08, 2003 at 02:52:38AM -0700, Bill Huey wrote:
> > No, it's not a fully preemptive kernel, but spreads preemption points
> > throughout the source tree, both directly and indirectly, instead. Spinlocks
> > are the primary mutex of choice in Linux and create atomic critical sections
> > that can't be preempted with respect to the normal Linux scheduler. Fully
>
> Geez, this isn't exactly right either, my brain is failing me at the moment.
I was right the first time. :) Just remember why breaking a spinlock is
a bad thing to do. :)
bill
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu May 15 2003 - 22:00:27 EST