Re: [PATCH] 2.5.68 FUTEX support should be optional

From: Christoph Hellwig (hch@infradead.org)
Date: Wed May 14 2003 - 01:14:46 EST

Next message: William Lee Irwin III: "Re: drivers/scsi/aic7xxx/aic7xxx_osm.c: warning is error"
Previous message: Christopher Hoover: "RE: [PATCH] 2.5.68: Don't include SCSI block ioctls on non-scsi systems"
In reply to: Christopher Hoover: "[PATCH] 2.5.68 FUTEX support should be optional"
Next in thread: Miles Bader: "Re: [PATCH] 2.5.68 FUTEX support should be optional"
Reply: Miles Bader: "Re: [PATCH] 2.5.68 FUTEX support should be optional"
Reply: Andrew Morton: "Re: [PATCH] 2.5.68 FUTEX support should be optional"
Reply: Christopher Hoover: "Re: [PATCH] 2.5.68 FUTEX support should be optional"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 09:32:07PM -0700, Christopher Hoover wrote:
> Not everyone needs futex support, so it should be optional. This is
> needed for small platforms.

Looks good. I think you want to disable it unconditionally for !CONFIG_MMU.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: William Lee Irwin III: "Re: drivers/scsi/aic7xxx/aic7xxx_osm.c: warning is error"
Previous message: Christopher Hoover: "RE: [PATCH] 2.5.68: Don't include SCSI block ioctls on non-scsi systems"
In reply to: Christopher Hoover: "[PATCH] 2.5.68 FUTEX support should be optional"
Next in thread: Miles Bader: "Re: [PATCH] 2.5.68 FUTEX support should be optional"
Reply: Miles Bader: "Re: [PATCH] 2.5.68 FUTEX support should be optional"
Reply: Andrew Morton: "Re: [PATCH] 2.5.68 FUTEX support should be optional"
Reply: Christopher Hoover: "Re: [PATCH] 2.5.68 FUTEX support should be optional"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu May 15 2003 - 22:00:50 EST