Re: [PATCH] 2.5.68 FUTEX support should be optional

From: Christoph Hellwig (hch@infradead.org)
Date: Wed May 14 2003 - 01:28:02 EST

Next message: William Lee Irwin III: "Re: ahc_linux_map_seg() compile/style/data corruption fixes"
Previous message: Justin T. Gibbs: "Re: ahc_linux_map_seg() compile/style/data corruption fixes"
In reply to: Miles Bader: "Re: [PATCH] 2.5.68 FUTEX support should be optional"
Next in thread: Andrew Morton: "Re: [PATCH] 2.5.68 FUTEX support should be optional"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 03:20:54PM +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
> Are futexes unusable without an MMU (I don't know anything about the
> implementation)?

The futex implementation relies heavily on follow_page() which is stubbed out
for nommu builds.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: William Lee Irwin III: "Re: ahc_linux_map_seg() compile/style/data corruption fixes"
Previous message: Justin T. Gibbs: "Re: ahc_linux_map_seg() compile/style/data corruption fixes"
In reply to: Miles Bader: "Re: [PATCH] 2.5.68 FUTEX support should be optional"
Next in thread: Andrew Morton: "Re: [PATCH] 2.5.68 FUTEX support should be optional"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu May 15 2003 - 22:00:50 EST