Hi.
> This is really a trademark related labelling issue. The trademark
> allows Linus or his assignee to specify in what way Linux (tm) may
> be used in labelling and advertising. Linux is just like other
> products with third-party parts and supplies. If Linus's assignee
> (Linux international?) where to specify explicit guidelines then
> people would know what to expect. Something like:
>
> Linux certified:
> The mainline kernel has a driver and it has been certified
> as functioning with this hardware by OSDL or some other
> officially sanctioned lab.
>
> Linux supported:
> The mainline kernel has a driver.
Fine so far.
> Linux compatible:
> Source code driver is available as a patch.
In other words, if a patch is available for the 1.0.0 kernel, they
can claim "Linux compatible" ??? That's meaningless...replace with
something like...
Linux 2.2.2 compatible:
Source code driver is available as a patch for the stated
mainline kernel.
...with the specific version to be made explicit. As a minimum, it
needs to state the actual kernel series the patch is for.
> Runs on Linux:
> A binary only driver is available that can be used with
> mainline kernel.
Similar comments apply. Again, require that the kernel that driver
works with is made explicit.
> Supports Linux:
> A portion of the purchase price will be donated to
> Linux International.
So a company provides a product for $5,000.00 and donates $0.01 of
the purchase price to the specified organisation, thus entitling
themselves to say "Supports Linux" by this rule. Can I suggest
this alternative definition:
Supports Linux:
At least 1% of the purchase price will be donated to
Linux International.
> You will notice this all relates to mainline kernels (Linus and
> Marcello). If the product requires a vendor kernel they need to
> negotiate with the vendor to say so.
Agreed.
> These are just suggestions. Many other products (including MS
> windows) have similar labelling restrictions, often with logos.
> Use of the term "Linux" in packaging or advertising or products
> inconsistent with the official designations would be trademark
> infringement.
Agreed.
> Different rules would apply to products that exist strictly in
> user-space.
That's not necessary - just define:
Runs under Linux:
This product work on a system based on a mainline Linux
kernel without making any modification to the kernel
itself or loading any kernel modules.
That is all that is required there.
Best wishes from Riley.
--- * Nothing as pretty as a smile, nothing as ugly as a frown.--- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.481 / Virus Database: 277 - Release Date: 13-May-2003
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu May 15 2003 - 22:00:50 EST