Re: [PATCH] PAG support, try #2

From: Matthew Wilcox (willy@debian.org)
Date: Wed May 14 2003 - 06:49:53 EST


On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 11:43:31AM +0100, David Howells wrote:
> +typedef int __kernel_pag_t;

> +typedef __kernel_pag_t pag_t;

> +static pag_t vfs_pag_next = 1;

> + vfspag->pag = vfs_pag_next++;
> + if (vfspag->pag < 1)
> + vfspag->pag = 1;

Is there a reason pag_t isn't an unsigned int? Seems to me you'll have
2^31 good times followed by 2^31 bad times. Also, isn't signed overflow
one of these undefined things? I wouldn't mention it except that gcc
seem to be more and more fond of obeying the letter of the standard
rather than doing useful stuff.

-- 
"It's not Hollywood.  War is real, war is primarily not about defeat or
victory, it is about death.  I've seen thousands and thousands of dead bodies.
Do you think I want to have an academic debate on this subject?" -- Robert Fisk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu May 15 2003 - 22:00:51 EST