Re: [PATCH] __optional and __keep

• Next message: Andreas Dilger: "Re: O_DIRECT write to file by block-aligned, block-multiple buf fails?"
• Previous message: Denis Vlasenko: "Re: Posible memory leak!?"
• In reply to: Rusty Russell: "[PATCH] __optional and __keep"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> Hi all!
>
> Does anyone else find __attribute_used__ confusing, or is it just me? In the
> tradition of likely() and unlikely(), I think __optional and __keep are
> clearer.
>
> Thoughts?
> Rusty.
> --

Yes, I thought that we had already hashed thru this one time.
I'm fine with the current naming.

~Randy

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Andreas Dilger: "Re: O_DIRECT write to file by block-aligned, block-multiple buf fails?"
• Previous message: Denis Vlasenko: "Re: Posible memory leak!?"
• In reply to: Rusty Russell: "[PATCH] __optional and __keep"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu May 15 2003 - 22:00:55 EST